First off - I don't listen to Little Wayne, never have, and don't plan to. But, regarding some of the general ideas being discussed here . . .
Labelling somthing as "art" or "creative" does not suddenly free the artist from responsibility for the statement his work makes and it doesn't make the work immune to criticism. In this thread, the other Little Wayne Thread, and the Nas thread, this idea keeps coming up that it's somehow wrong to criticize someone's artistic expression. That makes absolutely no sense to me. It doesn't matter if it's art, wrong is wrong. It's one thing to say you disagree with the statement but can still appreciate the art involved, but what I'm reading here over and over is that if there is art involved, one should not even evaluate the statement.
You have to realize the position this thinking puts us into. Absolutely anything can be said to or about us, and as long as it's wrapped up in an artistic package, we let it go. Tell our kids that a drug dealer's lifestyle is desireable? That's cool cuz it's art. Tell the world that our woman should "walk around the club with your thumb in your mouth, put my dick in, pull your thumb out?" No problem, it's got a great beat. Brag about how many niggas you killed in a city that is currently plagued by violence and murder? That's ok cuz it sounds pretty.
Does this mean that we would not have been outraged if Kramer's tirade about hanging people had included more rhyme? Would Don Imus have been fine if "Nappy Headed Hoes" was the hook in his song? Cuz really, everything these guys said and worse can be found on hip-hop radio stations.